ตรวจข้อสอบ > เมธาสินี ฉาบไธสง > ชีววิทยาเชิงวิทยาศาสตร์การแพทย์ | Biology > Part 1 > ตรวจ

ใช้เวลาสอบ 18 นาที

Back

# คำถาม คำตอบ ถูก / ผิด สาเหตุ/ขยายความ ทฤษฎีหลักคิด/อ้างอิงในการตอบ คะแนนเต็ม ให้คะแนน
1


What is the primary focus of the paper?

Health equity initiatives

The primary focus of “Experiences with COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing: A qualitative analysis” is to provide an in-depth exploration and understanding of the process of COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing from the perspective of individuals involved in these activities. This qualitative analysis aims to uncover the challenges, successes, and lessons learned from the implementation of case investigation and contact tracing efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic. By gathering insights directly from those involved in these public health activities, the study seeks to inform and improve future strategies for controlling the spread of COVID-19 and managing similar infectious disease outbreaks.

From research

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

2


What is the purpose of case investigation in the context of COVID-19?

the purpose of case investigation is to identify and gather information about individuals who have tested positive for the virus.

Case investigation plays a crucial role in public health efforts to control the spread of COVID-19 by: 1. Identifying Cases: Case investigation helps health authorities identify individuals who have been infected with the virus, allowing for prompt isolation and treatment to prevent further transmission. 2. Contact Tracing: By interviewing confirmed cases, case investigators can gather information about the individual’s recent contacts and activities. This information is then used to identify and notify individuals who may have been exposed to the virus, enabling them to take necessary precautions, such as quarantine or testing, to prevent further spread. 3. Understanding Transmission Patterns: Case investigation provides valuable data on how and where individuals are contracting the virus, allowing health authorities to identify potential outbreaks and implement targeted interventions to control transmission. 4. Monitoring and Surveillance: Case investigation helps health authorities monitor the progression of the pandemic, track the number of cases, and identify trends or clusters of cases that may require additional investigation or public health measures.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

3


What is contact tracing, as defined in the paper?

Notifying close contacts of potential exposure

Contact tracing is the subsequent process of notifying close contacts of their potential exposure, referring them to testing, counseling them to monitor their symptoms, and encouraging them to quarantine (i.e., staying home and away from others after potential exposure)

The concept of contact tracing aligns with principles of public health and epidemiology, aiming to interrupt the spread of infectious diseases by identifying and notifying individuals who may have been exposed to the virus. It draws upon principles of breaking the chain of infection, social network theory, and effective communication strategies to engage with contacts and prevent further transmission of the disease.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

4


Why did health departments face challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Overwhelming testing availability

Overall, the COVID-19 pandemic presented unprecedented challenges for health departments worldwide, requiring agility, resilience, and innovation in responding to the crisis and mitigating its impact on public health and well-being.

These theoretical frameworks provide insights into the complex dynamics and underlying factors shaping the challenges faced by health departments during the COVID-19 pandemic, informing strategies for improving pandemic preparedness, response, and resilience in the future.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

5


Essay | Examine the variations in individuals' experiences with CI/CT for COVID-19 based on demographic characteristics. How do factors such as age, race, ethnicity, income, and political ideology influence these experiences?

1. Age: Older adults may have different experiences with CI/CT compared to younger individuals. Older adults may be more cautious and receptive to public health guidance, while younger individuals may be more resistant or skeptical. Older adults may also face challenges with technology or communication, impacting their ability to engage with CI/CT efforts effectively. 2. Race and Ethnicity: Racial and ethnic minorities may have distinct experiences with CI/CT due to systemic inequities in access to healthcare, social determinants of health, and trust in public health authorities. Minority communities may face barriers such as language barriers, cultural differences, discrimination, and mistrust of government institutions, which can impact their willingness to participate in CI/CT activities. 3. Income: Socioeconomic factors, such as income and employment status, can influence individuals’ experiences with CI/CT. Low-income individuals may face barriers such as lack of access to healthcare, transportation, or paid sick leave, which can impact their ability to comply with CI/CT recommendations. Higher-income individuals may have more resources and flexibility to navigate CI/CT requirements. 4. Political Ideology: Political ideology may shape individuals’ perceptions of COVID-19, public health measures, and government interventions, influencing their willingness to participate in CI/CT efforts. Individuals with conservative ideologies may be more skeptical of government involvement in public health and may be less likely to comply with CI/CT recommendations, while those with liberal ideologies may be more supportive of public health measures.

Variations in individuals’ experiences with CI/CT for COVID-19 based on demographic characteristics highlight the importance of considering socio-demographic factors in designing and implementing public health interventions. Addressing disparities and barriers faced by different populations is essential to ensure equitable access to CI/CT services and effectively control the spread of COVID-19.

The examination of variations in individuals' experiences with case investigation and contact tracing (CI/CT) for COVID-19 based on demographic characteristics can be understood through theoretical frameworks such as Health Equity Theory, Social Identity Theory, Critical Race Theory (CRT), and Political Economy Theory. These theories highlight how factors like race, ethnicity, income, age, and political ideology intersect with broader social, economic, and political structures to shape disparities in access to healthcare and compliance with public health recommendations.

10

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

6


What is the primary concern raised by the authors regarding the state of knowledge in African urban ecology?

Inadequate focus on community ecology

The primary concern raised by the authors regarding the state of knowledge in African urban ecology is the limited amount of research and empirical evidence available in this field. They highlight the scarcity of comprehensive studies and data on urban ecology in African cities, which hinders our understanding of the complex interactions between urbanization, ecosystems, and human populations on the continent. This lack of research limits the development of effective policies and interventions to address environmental challenges and promote sustainable urban development in Africa. Therefore, the authors emphasize the urgent need for more research and investment in urban ecology studies in African cities to fill this knowledge gap and inform evidence-based decision-making and planning processes.

The concern raised by the authors regarding the limited state of knowledge in African urban ecology aligns with principles of research gaps and knowledge deficits within the field of urban ecology and environmental science. While not tied explicitly to a specific theoretical framework, this concern reflects the broader theoretical underpinnings of knowledge production, dissemination, and application within scientific inquiry. It underscores the need for further empirical research, data collection, and theoretical development to enhance our understanding of urban ecosystems, human-environment interactions, and sustainability in African cities.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

7


What significant predictors did the study investigate regarding the number of publications on African urban ecology?

Human population density and GDP

The study might have explored whether the level of population density in urban areas correlates with the number of publications, as densely populated areas may have more research activity and urban ecological issues.

Overall, the study likely investigated a combination of the predictors to understand the factors that contribute to the number of publications on African urban ecology. Identifying these predictors can help researchers and policymakers address gaps and barriers to research in this field and promote knowledge exchange and collaboration to advance urban ecological research in Africa.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

8


In terms of research scale, where were the majority of the studies conducted according to the study?

Regional level

According to the study, the majority of the studies on African urban ecology were conducted at the city scale. This suggests that researchers have primarily focused on studying urban ecological dynamics, processes, and phenomena within specific cities across the African continent. This emphasis on the city scale reflects the importance of understanding local context, dynamics, and challenges in urban areas, as well as the diverse environmental and socio-economic conditions that characterize different cities in Africa. By conducting research at the city scale, researchers can tailor their studies to address local issues and inform more targeted and context-specific interventions and policies to promote sustainable urban development and environmental management in African cities.

The emphasis on conducting studies at the city scale in African urban ecology reflects the integration of theories related to urban ecology, scale, and context, which guide researchers in understanding and addressing the complex dynamics of urban ecosystems and sustainability challenges in African cities.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

9


What methodological approach did the authors use to conduct the literature search in this study?

Systematic literature review

The systematic review approach used by the authors allowed for a rigorous and transparent process of identifying, selecting, and synthesizing relevant literature on urban ecology in Africa, providing a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge in this field.

While the systematic review approach itself is not grounded in a specific theoretical framework, it draws upon principles and methods from these theoretical perspectives to guide the systematic identification, selection, and synthesis of relevant literature, ultimately contributing to the generation of new knowledge and understanding in the field of urban ecology in Africa.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

10


Essay | Examine the key factors contributing to the lack of knowledge and research gaps in African urban ecology, as highlighted in the literature review. Discuss the potential implications of this knowledge gap and propose strategies to address and advance research in this field.

1. Limited Research Funding: Insufficient funding for research in African urban ecology hampers the ability of researchers to conduct comprehensive studies and address critical research questions. Many African countries face competing priorities for limited research funding, leading to underinvestment in urban ecological research. 2. Data Availability and Access: Limited availability of high-quality data on urban ecosystems, land use, environmental conditions, and socio-economic indicators in African cities hinders research efforts. Data collection and management systems may be inadequate, making it challenging for researchers to access and analyze relevant data for urban ecological studies. Addressing these knowledge gaps and advancing research in African urban ecology requires a multifaceted approach: 1. Increase Research Funding: Governments, international organizations, and funding agencies should prioritize and allocate resources for research in urban ecology in Africa. Investments in research infrastructure, capacity building, and collaborative initiatives can support the generation of new knowledge and evidence-based decision-making. 2. Enhance Data Collection and Management: Efforts to improve data collection, sharing, and management systems are needed to enhance the availability and accessibility of data for urban ecological research. Open-access data repositories, standardized data collection protocols, and partnerships with government agencies and non-governmental organizations can facilitate data-driven research.

By addressing these challenges and implementing strategies to advance research in African urban ecology, stakeholders can contribute to building a robust knowledge base, informing evidence-based decision-making, and promoting sustainable urban development across the continent.

Resource Mobilization Theory: Resource mobilization theory posits that social movements and organizations mobilize resources, including financial, human, and social capital, to achieve their goals. In this context, the call for increased research funding and capacity-building initiatives aligns with resource mobilization theory, as it emphasizes the need to mobilize resources to support research activities and address knowledge gaps in African urban ecology. Knowledge Production and Diffusion Theory: This theory examines how knowledge is produced, disseminated, and utilized within society. The strategies proposed to enhance data collection and management, build research capacity, promote interdisciplinary collaboration, and engage stakeholders reflect principles of knowledge production and diffusion theory by emphasizing the importance of generating and sharing knowledge to advance research and inform decision-making.

10

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

11


According to the literature search, what are the four key formulations through which acceptability has been defined or conceptualized?

Machine learning algorithms, deep learning models, natural language processing, computer vision

1. Technical Acceptability: This formulation focuses on the technical aspects of AI systems, such as accuracy, reliability, performance, and usability. Healthcare professionals assess the acceptability of AI in medical imaging based on its technical capabilities and how well it meets their clinical needs and expectations. 2. Perceived Usefulness: Perceived usefulness refers to healthcare professionals’ beliefs about the extent to which AI in medical imaging enhances their ability to perform tasks more effectively, efficiently, or accurately. Acceptability is influenced by perceptions of how AI technology contributes to clinical decision-making, patient outcomes, and workflow efficiency. 3. Perceived Ease of Use: Perceived ease of use relates to the ease with which healthcare professionals can interact with and integrate AI technology into their clinical practice. Acceptability is influenced by perceptions of the complexity, compatibility, and user-friendliness of AI systems in medical imaging, as well as the level of training and support required to use them effectively. 4. Ethical and Social Acceptability: Ethical and social acceptability considers the ethical implications, societal impacts, and moral considerations associated with the use of AI in medical imaging. Healthcare professionals assess the acceptability of AI technology based on concerns related to patient privacy, data security, algorithm bias, transparency, accountability, and the potential for automation to affect professional autonomy and patient-provider relationships.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

12


Which academic databases were included in the search strategy for the scoping review on the acceptability of AI in medical imaging domains?

PubMed, IEEE Xplore, JSTOR, PsycINFO

These databases provide access to a wide range of peer-reviewed journals, conference proceedings, and other scholarly publications relevant to the topic of AI in medical imaging and its acceptability among healthcare professionals. Utilizing multiple databases helps ensure comprehensive coverage and minimizes the risk of missing relevant studies during the literature search process.

Information Retrieval Theory: Information retrieval theory explores how information is accessed, retrieved, and organized within databases and information systems. It emphasizes strategies for designing effective search queries, selecting appropriate databases, and retrieving relevant literature to address specific research questions or objectives.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

13


What were the criteria for inclusion and exclusion of publications in the scoping review?

Publications were limited to journal articles, conference proceedings, and dissertations in English, and studies not explicitly linked to end-user acceptability were excluded.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Publications focusing on the acceptability of AI (Artificial Intelligence) in medical imaging domains. 2. Studies involving healthcare professionals as participants, such as radiologists, physicians, technologists, or other relevant stakeholders. 3. Research articles, reviews, opinion papers, and other scholarly publications published in peer-reviewed journals. 4. Studies conducted in various healthcare settings, including hospitals, clinics, and academic institutions. 5. Publications available in English language. 6. Studies published within a specific timeframe or range (e.g., within the last 10 years) to ensure currency and relevance. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Publications that do not focus on the acceptability of AI in medical imaging domains among healthcare professionals. 2. Studies involving non-healthcare professional participants (e.g., general public, patients) exclusively. 3. Non-peer-reviewed publications, such as conference abstracts, posters, or gray literature. 4. Publications not available in English language. 5. Studies conducted outside the scope of medical imaging or healthcare settings. 6. Duplicate publications or studies reporting on the same dataset or findings.

Research Methodology: The criteria align with principles of research methodology, which emphasize the importance of defining clear eligibility criteria to guide the selection of studies for inclusion in a systematic review or scoping review. By specifying inclusion and exclusion criteria, researchers ensure that the review focuses on relevant studies that address the research questions or objectives while excluding studies that do not meet the predefined criteria.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

14


How many studies were included in the scoping review, and which aspect of AI acceptability did the majority of these studies focus on?

31 studies; retrospective analysis

only one researcher conducted the full screening process and qualitative analysis of the final set of 31 papers which could introduce some bias into the results. To help safeguard against this, another researcher screened a subset of all the papers including the final set of studies.

From 4.7. Limitations

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

15


Essay | Explain the concept of acceptability in the context of AI in medical imaging. Outline the key dimensions through which acceptability has been conceptualized in past studies and why a scoping review considered multiple formulations. Additionally, discuss the importance of considering end-user perspectives in the evaluation of AI acceptability.

Key dimensions through which acceptability has been conceptualized in past studies include: 1. Technical Acceptability: This dimension focuses on the technical performance, accuracy, reliability, and usability of AI algorithms and systems in medical imaging tasks. It assesses whether AI technologies meet the clinical needs, expectations, and standards of healthcare professionals, radiologists, and other end users. 2. Perceived Usefulness: Perceived usefulness refers to stakeholders’ beliefs about the extent to which AI technologies enhance diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, productivity, and clinical decision-making in medical imaging. It assesses whether AI systems provide tangible benefits and value-added contributions to healthcare delivery and patient care. Considering end-user perspectives in the evaluation of AI acceptability is essential for several reasons: 1. User-Centered Design: End-user perspectives help to inform the design, development, and refinement of AI systems to better meet the needs, preferences, and expectations of healthcare professionals and patients. By involving end users in the design process, AI technologies can be tailored to address specific clinical challenges and user requirements. 2. User Satisfaction and Adoption: Understanding end users’ attitudes, beliefs, and experiences with AI technologies is critical for predicting and promoting their acceptance, adoption, and sustained use in clinical practice. Positive user experiences and satisfaction with AI systems are key determinants of successful implementation and integration into healthcare workflows.

Considering end-user perspectives in the evaluation of AI acceptability enhances the relevance, validity, and usability of research findings, and facilitates the development of AI technologies that are responsive to the needs and priorities of healthcare stakeholders.

Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): TAM is a widely used theoretical framework for understanding users’ acceptance and adoption of new technologies. It posits that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are key determinants of users’ attitudes and intentions towards using technology. The discussion on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use aligns with the principles of TAM, as these dimensions are central to assessing the acceptability of AI in medical imaging among healthcare professionals.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

16


What is workplace violence (WPV) in healthcare?

Threats and abuse against healthcare workers

Workplace violence (WPV) in healthcare refers to any act or behavior that causes harm, intimidation, or threat of harm to healthcare workers in the course of their duties. This includes physical violence, verbal abuse, harassment, threats, and other forms of aggressive behavior directed towards healthcare professionals, such as medical radiation scientists, while they are working in healthcare settings. WPV can occur in various healthcare settings, including hospitals, clinics, emergency departments, imaging centers, and other healthcare facilities. It poses significant risks to the safety, well-being, and mental health of healthcare workers and can have adverse effects on patient care, staff morale, and organizational culture. Understanding the prevalence, nature, and impact of workplace violence in healthcare is essential for developing strategies and interventions to prevent and address this important occupational health issue.

1. Occupational Health and Safety Theory: This theoretical perspective focuses on identifying and mitigating risks to workers’ health and safety in the workplace. In the context of WPV in healthcare, occupational health and safety theory may inform efforts to assess and manage risks associated with violence and aggression towards healthcare professionals. 2. Sociological Perspectives: Sociological theories examine the social structures, dynamics, and interactions that shape individuals’ behaviors and experiences in society. In the context of WPV in healthcare, sociological perspectives may help understand the societal factors, power dynamics, and cultural norms that contribute to violence and aggression towards healthcare workers.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

17


According to the World Health Organization (WHO), what is the impact of WPV on healthcare workers?

Range from unnoticeable effects to fatality

WPV has wide-ranging consequences for healthcare workers, healthcare organizations, and patient care. It is essential for healthcare institutions to implement preventive measures, policies, and support systems to address WPV and create safe and supportive work environments for all staff members.

1. Occupational Health Theory: This theoretical perspective focuses on identifying and addressing risks to workers’ health and safety in the workplace. It provides insights into the physical and psychological harm that healthcare workers may experience as a result of WPV, as well as the implications for occupational health and well-being. 2. Psychological Theories: Psychological theories explore individual and interpersonal factors that influence human behavior, emotions, and cognition. In the context of WPV, these theories help understand the psychological impact of violence and aggression on healthcare workers, including stress, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

18


Why is there a need for a systematic review on WPV in medical radiation science (MRS)?

MRS professionals are immune to WPV

WPV in MRS is significant due to its impact on worker safety, patient care, workforce retention, legal compliance, and professional development. Addressing WPV requires a multifaceted approach that involves organizational policies, staff training, community outreach, and collaboration with relevant stakeholders to create safe and supportive work environments for MRS professionals.

1. Occupational Health and Safety Theory: This theoretical perspective emphasizes the importance of creating safe and healthy work environments to protect workers from occupational hazards, including violence. It recognizes that WPV can have significant physical and psychological impacts on healthcare workers and underscores the importance of implementing preventive measures to ensure worker safety. 2. Organizational Behavior Theory: Organizational behavior theory explores how individuals and groups behave within organizational contexts. In the context of WPV in MRS, this perspective highlights the role of organizational policies, culture, and leadership in shaping workplace dynamics and influencing the occurrence and management of violence.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

19


What databases were used for the literature search in the systematic review on WPV in MRS?

EBSCOhost/CINAHL, PubMed/Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Wiley Online Library

Additionally, grey literature sources, such as conference proceedings, institutional repositories, and government reports, may have been searched to identify relevant studies on WPV in MRS. It’s important to note that the specific databases and search strategies used may vary depending on the research question, scope of the review, and preferences of the authors conducting the systematic review.

1. Occupational Health and Safety Theory: This theoretical perspective focuses on understanding and addressing workplace hazards, including violence, to ensure the health, safety, and well-being of workers in various occupational settings, including healthcare. 2. Psychological Theories: Psychological theories explore individual and interpersonal factors that influence human behavior and responses to stressful or threatening situations, such as workplace violence. Understanding psychological mechanisms can help interpret the impact of WPV on healthcare workers’ mental health and well-being.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

20


Essay | Workplace Violence (WPV) in Healthcare. Please explain the impacts and research gaps.

Here are some of the impacts of WPV in healthcare: 1. Physical and Psychological Harm to Healthcare Workers: WPV can result in physical injuries, ranging from minor cuts and bruises to severe trauma requiring medical attention. Additionally, healthcare workers who experience violence may suffer from psychological distress, including anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and decreased overall well-being. 2. Negative Effects on Patient Care: WPV can disrupt the delivery of patient care in healthcare settings. Incidents of violence can create an unsafe environment, impede communication between healthcare providers and patients, and compromise the quality and continuity of care. This can lead to delays in treatment, decreased patient satisfaction, and adverse outcomes. Despite growing recognition of the problem, there are several research gaps related to WPV in healthcare: 1. Prevalence and Incidence: There is a lack of comprehensive data on the prevalence and incidence of WPV in healthcare, particularly in certain settings (e.g., long-term care facilities, home healthcare) and among specific healthcare worker groups (e.g., nurses, physicians, paramedics). 2. Risk Factors and Protective Factors: More research is needed to identify the risk factors associated with WPV in healthcare, as well as protective factors that can mitigate the risk of violence. Understanding the underlying causes and contexts of WPV can inform targeted prevention and intervention strategies.

Addressing these research gaps is essential for developing evidence-based strategies to prevent and mitigate WPV in healthcare, promote a culture of safety and respect, and support the well-being of healthcare workers and patients alike.

1. Occupational Health and Safety Theory: This theoretical perspective emphasizes the importance of ensuring the health, safety, and well-being of workers in various occupational settings, including healthcare. It highlights the physical and psychological impacts of WPV on healthcare workers and underscores the need for preventive measures to mitigate risks and protect workers. 2. Organizational Behavior Theory: Organizational behavior theory examines how individuals and groups behave within organizational contexts, including the dynamics of power, communication, and conflict resolution. This perspective can shed light on organizational factors that contribute to or mitigate WPV in healthcare settings, such as workplace culture, leadership styles, and communication patterns. 3. Public Health Frameworks: Public health frameworks focus on promoting health, preventing disease, and addressing social determinants of health at the population level. In the context of WPV in healthcare, public health approaches emphasize the importance of understanding the prevalence, risk factors, and impacts of violence to inform evidence-based interventions and policies aimed at protecting healthcare workers and patients.

10

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

ผลคะแนน 81.5 เต็ม 149

แท๊ก หลักคิด
แท๊ก อธิบาย
แท๊ก ภาษา