ตรวจข้อสอบ > ปิยพิชญ์ พุ่มทอง > ความถนัดฟิสิกส์ทางวิศวกรรมศาสตร์ | Engineering Physics Aptitude > Part 1 > ตรวจ

ใช้เวลาสอบ 0 นาที

Back

# คำถาม คำตอบ ถูก / ผิด สาเหตุ/ขยายความ ทฤษฎีหลักคิด/อ้างอิงในการตอบ คะแนนเต็ม ให้คะแนน
1


What is the primary advantage of 3D food printing?

Precise and customized food creations

The sentence that led me to this answer is: "3D food printing is poised to revolutionize the gastronomic landscape by offering precise and customized food creations." Essentially, 3D food printing allows for a level of control and customization over food that was previously impossible. It opens up a world of possibilities for chefs, nutritionists, and individuals looking to create unique and tailored culinary experiences.

By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Printing the future of food: The physics perspective on 3D food printing by Muhammad Waseem, Asad Ullah Tahir and Yaqoob Majeed. Precise: 3D food printers can create food with exact measurements and shapes. This level of control is difficult to achieve through traditional cooking methods. Customized: You can design and create food that meets specific dietary needs, allergies, or personal preferences. This level of personalization is unmatched by traditional cooking. So essentially, 3D food printing allows for a level of control and customization over food that was previously impossible. It opens up a world of possibilities for chefs, nutritionists, and individuals looking to create unique and tailored culinary experiences.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

2


Which component is NOT part of a standard 3D food printer?

Mixing bowl

The sentence that led me to this answer is: "A standard food printer is made up of three parts: a computer that allows the user to interact with the printer via software, software that enables the computer to communicate with the motor control box, and food printer motors that are controlled by the control box."

The sentence that led me to this answer is: "A standard food printer is made up of three parts: a computer that allows the user to interact with the printer via software, software that enables the computer to communicate with the motor control box, and food printer motors that are controlled by the control box." This clearly outlines the three main components of a standard food printer, and a mixing bowl isn't mentioned among them. While a mixing bowl might be used in food preparation before the printing process, it's not an integral part of the printer itself. And by using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Printing the future of food: The physics perspective on 3D food printing by Muhammad Waseem, Asad Ullah Tahir and Yaqoob Majeed.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

3


If a 3D printer deposits a food layer with a thickness of 0.1 mm and builds up to a height of 20 mm, how many layers are required?

200

If each layer is 0.1 mm thick and we want to reach a height of 20 mm, we divide the total height by the thickness of one layer: 20 mm / 0.1 mm/layer = 200 layers.

By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Printing the future of food: The physics perspective on 3D food printing by Muhammad Waseem, Asad Ullah Tahir and Yaqoob Majeed. If each layer is 0.1 mm thick and we want to reach a height of 20 mm, we divide the total height by the thickness of one layer: 20 mm / 0.1 mm/layer = 200 layers.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

4


A printer uses an extrusion process where the food material flows at a rate of 5 mm³/s. How long will it take to print a food item of 1000 mm³

200 seconds

So, I think the answer is 200 seconds. To figure this out, we need to divide the total volume of the food item by the rate at which the material flows. The total volume of the food item is 1000 mm³. The material flow rate is 5 mm³/s. So, the calculation is: 1000 mm³ / 5 mm³/s = 200 seconds.

By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Printing the future of food: The physics perspective on 3D food printing by Muhammad Waseem, Asad Ullah Tahir and Yaqoob Majeed. So, I think the answer is 200 seconds. To figure this out, we need to divide the total volume of the food item by the rate at which the material flows. The total volume of the food item is 1000 mm³. The material flow rate is 5 mm³/s. So, the calculation is: 1000 mm³ / 5 mm³/s = 200 seconds.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

5


What role does rheology play in 3D food printing?

It controls the viscosity and elasticity of food in the extrusion process.

The sentence that helped me answer this is: "Rheology: Material flow and deformation Food materials' elasticity, shear-thinning behavior, and yield stress impact their appropriateness for 3D printing and help achieve form accuracy and structural integrity."

By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Printing the future of food: The physics perspective on 3D food printing by Muhammad Waseem, Asad Ullah Tahir and Yaqoob Majeed. The sentence that helped me answer this is: "Rheology: Material flow and deformation Food materials' elasticity, shear-thinning behavior, and yield stress impact their appropriateness for 3D printing and help achieve form accuracy and structural integrity." This clearly explains that rheology is crucial in determining how food materials behave during the printing process, specifically in terms of their viscosity and elasticity.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

6


If the surface tension of a food material affects its ability to form shapes, what physical property does it influence the most during printing?

Adhesion

The sentence that helped me answer this is: "Surface tension shapes and smooths printed food."

By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Printing the future of food: The physics perspective on 3D food printing by Muhammad Waseem, Asad Ullah Tahir and Yaqoob Majeed. The sentence that helped me answer this is: "Surface tension shapes and smooths printed food." Since surface tension influences the shape of the printed food, it directly affects how well the food material sticks or adheres to itself and the printing surface. Therefore, adhesion is the most influenced property.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

7


Heat transfer in 3D food printing affects the quality of the final product. Which heat transfer method is NOT typically involved in 3D food printing?

Evaporation

The sentence that helped me answer this is: "3D food printing transfers heat in numerous ways: Conduction, Convection, and Radiation."

By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Printing the future of food: The physics perspective on 3D food printing by Muhammad Waseem, Asad Ullah Tahir and Yaqoob Majeed. The sentence that helped me answer this is: "3D food printing transfers heat in numerous ways: Conduction, Convection, and Radiation." This clearly states the three primary methods of heat transfer involved in 3D food printing, and evaporation is not mentioned among them. Evaporation typically refers to the process of a liquid turning into a gas, which doesn't directly relate to the heat transfer within a solid object like 3D-printed food.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

8


If a 3D printer uses a laser with a power of 10 W and the efficiency of converting electrical energy to thermal energy is 80%, what is the actual thermal energy used for printing?

8 W

So, I think the answer is 8 W. We're told that the laser has a power of 10 W, but the efficiency of converting electrical energy to thermal energy is only 80%. To find the actual thermal energy used, we need to calculate 80% of 10 W. 80% of 10 W is equal to (80/100) * 10 W = 8 W. Therefore, the actual thermal energy used for printing is 8 W.

By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Printing the future of food: The physics perspective on 3D food printing by Muhammad Waseem, Asad Ullah Tahir and Yaqoob Majeed. So, I think the answer is 8 W. We're told that the laser has a power of 10 W, but the efficiency of converting electrical energy to thermal energy is only 80%. To find the actual thermal energy used, we need to calculate 80% of 10 W. 80% of 10 W is equal to (80/100) * 10 W = 8 W. Therefore, the actual thermal energy used for printing is 8 W.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

9


Assume the thermal conductivity of a food material is 0.2 W/mK. If the temperature gradient is 10 K/m, what is the heat flux through the material?

2 W/m²

To calculate the heat flux, we use the formula: Heat flux (q) = Thermal conductivity (k) * Temperature gradient (dT/dx) We're given: Thermal conductivity (k) = 0.2 W/mK Temperature gradient (dT/dx) = 10 K/m Plugging these values into the formula, we get: q = 0.2 W/mK * 10 K/m = 2 W/m²

By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Printing the future of food: The physics perspective on 3D food printing by Muhammad Waseem, Asad Ullah Tahir and Yaqoob Majeed. To calculate the heat flux, we use the formula: Heat flux (q) = Thermal conductivity (k) * Temperature gradient (dT/dx) We're given: Thermal conductivity (k) = 0.2 W/mK Temperature gradient (dT/dx) = 10 K/m Plugging these values into the formula, we get: q = 0.2 W/mK * 10 K/m = 2 W/m²

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

10


What is the significance of surface tension in the context of 3D food printing?

It governs the shape and appearance of the printed food surface.

The sentence that helped me answer this is: "Surface tension shapes and smooths printed food."

By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Printing the future of food: The physics perspective on 3D food printing by Muhammad Waseem, Asad Ullah Tahir and Yaqoob Majeed. The sentence that helped me answer this is: "Surface tension shapes and smooths printed food." This directly states that surface tension plays a key role in determining the final shape and appearance of the 3D printed food.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

11


What is the primary benefit of using electrostatic field-assisted freezing (EFAF) on gluten?

Improves functional properties of gluten

The sentence that led me to this answer is: "EFAF improved the functional properties of gluten with enhanced water holding, emulsifying and foaming properties."

The sentence that led me to this answer is: "EFAF improved the functional properties of gluten with enhanced water holding, emulsifying and foaming properties." This statement clearly indicates that EFAF directly impacts and enhances gluten's functional capabilities, making it a more desirable ingredient for various food products. By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Effects of electrostatic field-assisted freezing on the functional properties and aggregation behavior of gluten by Yanyan Zhang, Siqi Zhang, Bingrui Wang, Hongwei Wang, Xingli Lui and Hua Zhang.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

12


Which functional property of gluten is NOT improved by EFAF according to the article?

Gluten elasticity

So, I think the functional property of gluten that is NOT improved by EFAF is Gluten Elasticity. While the article extensively discusses how EFAF enhances water holding capacity, emulsifying properties, and foaming properties, it doesn't specifically mention any improvements in gluten elasticity. The article focuses primarily on the effects of EFAF on these three functional properties, and there's no direct evidence suggesting that elasticity is positively impacted.

By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Effects of electrostatic field-assisted freezing on the functional properties and aggregation behavior of gluten by Yanyan Zhang, Siqi Zhang, Bingrui Wang, Hongwei Wang, Xingli Lui and Hua Zhang. So, I think the functional property of gluten that is NOT improved by EFAF is Gluten Elasticity. While the article extensively discusses how EFAF enhances water holding capacity, emulsifying properties, and foaming properties, it doesn't specifically mention any improvements in gluten elasticity. The article focuses primarily on the effects of EFAF on these three functional properties, and there's no direct evidence suggesting that elasticity is positively impacted.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

13


If the WHC (Water Holding Capacity) of gluten increased by 0.25% under 900 V electrostatic field compared to the control, what would be the new WHC if the original was 55%?

55.15%

If the original WHC was 55% and it increased by 0.25% under a 900V electrostatic field, we need to add 0.25% of 55 to the original value. 0.25% of 55 is (0.25/100) * 55 = 0.1375 Now, add this increase to the original WHC: New WHC = 55 + 0.1375 = 55.1375 Therefore, the closest answer is 55.15%.

By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Effects of electrostatic field-assisted freezing on the functional properties and aggregation behavior of gluten by Yanyan Zhang, Siqi Zhang, Bingrui Wang, Hongwei Wang, Xingli Lui and Hua Zhang. If the original WHC was 55% and it increased by 0.25% under a 900V electrostatic field, we need to add 0.25% of 55 to the original value. 0.25% of 55 is (0.25/100) * 55 = 0.1375 Now, add this increase to the original WHC: New WHC = 55 + 0.1375 = 55.1375 Therefore, the closest answer is 55.15%.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

14


If a sample of gluten (50 mg) is added to 4 mL of water and centrifuged, resulting in a dry weight of 20 mg, what is the WHC?

1.5

First, we need to determine the amount of water held by the gluten. We start with 50 mg of gluten and end up with 20 mg of dry weight, so the gluten held 50 mg - 20 mg = 30 mg of water. The formula for WHC is: WHC = (Amount of water held by gluten / Dry weight of gluten) * 100 Plugging in the values: WHC = (30 mg / 20 mg) * 100 = 1.5 So, the WHC is 1.5.

By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Effects of electrostatic field-assisted freezing on the functional properties and aggregation behavior of gluten by Yanyan Zhang, Siqi Zhang, Bingrui Wang, Hongwei Wang, Xingli Lui and Hua Zhang. First, we need to determine the amount of water held by the gluten. We start with 50 mg of gluten and end up with 20 mg of dry weight, so the gluten held 50 mg - 20 mg = 30 mg of water. The formula for WHC is: WHC = (Amount of water held by gluten / Dry weight of gluten) * 100 Plugging in the values: WHC = (30 mg / 20 mg) * 100 = 1.5 So, the WHC is 1.5.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

15


How does EFAF affect the α-helix content of gluten proteins?

Increases α-helix content

The key sentence that supports this is: "The results showed that the content of α-helix, β-turn and random coils increased in gluten, while the content of β-sheet decreased." This indicates that the α-helix content specifically goes up as a result of the EFAF process.

By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Effects of electrostatic field-assisted freezing on the functional properties and aggregation behavior of gluten by Yanyan Zhang, Siqi Zhang, Bingrui Wang, Hongwei Wang, Xingli Lui and Hua Zhang. The key sentence that supports this is: "The results showed that the content of α-helix, β-turn and random coils increased in gluten, while the content of β-sheet decreased." This indicates that the α-helix content specifically goes up as a result of the EFAF process.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

16


What is the effect of EFAF on the depolymerization degree of gluten macromolecules at 600 V?

ecreases to 5.71%

The key sentence supporting this answer is: "The degree of depolymerization of gluten macromolecules decreased when the electrostatic field was applied, and was obtained to be the lowest at 600 V with 5.71%, which was significantly different from that without applied electrostatic field (P < 0.05)."

By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Effects of electrostatic field-assisted freezing on the functional properties and aggregation behavior of gluten by Yanyan Zhang, Siqi Zhang, Bingrui Wang, Hongwei Wang, Xingli Lui and Hua Zhang. So, the depolymerization decreases because the molecules are getting bigger, not smaller. And the specific number given for the lowest depolymerization degree is 5.71% at 600 volts. Therefore, the correct answer is: Ecreases To 5.71%

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

17


Assuming the electrostatic field changes the orientation of water molecules, what physical property does this directly influence during freezing?

Free energy

The key piece of information is that the electrostatic field changes the orientation of water molecules. This change in orientation affects the overall energy state of the system, which is directly related to free energy. Free energy is a thermodynamic property that measures the potential for reversible work. By altering the water molecule orientation, the electrostatic field changes the system's energy state, thus impacting its free energy.

By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Effects of electrostatic field-assisted freezing on the functional properties and aggregation behavior of gluten by Yanyan Zhang, Siqi Zhang, Bingrui Wang, Hongwei Wang, Xingli Lui and Hua Zhang. The key piece of information is that the electrostatic field changes the orientation of water molecules. This change in orientation affects the overall energy state of the system, which is directly related to free energy. Free energy is a thermodynamic property that measures the potential for reversible work. By altering the water molecule orientation, the electrostatic field changes the system's energy state, thus impacting its free energy.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

18


Given that the electrostatic field is applied at 900 V and improves the water holding capacity by 0.25%, calculate the increase if the original water holding capacity was 2.5 g/g.

0.00625 g/g

We know that the original water holding capacity is 2.5 g/g and it increased by 0.25% under a 900 V electrostatic field. To find the actual increase, we need to calculate 0.25% of 2.5 g/g. 0.25% of 2.5 g/g = (0.25 / 100) * 2.5 g/g = 0.00625 g/g So, the increase in water holding capacity is 0.00625 g/g.

By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Effects of electrostatic field-assisted freezing on the functional properties and aggregation behavior of gluten by Yanyan Zhang, Siqi Zhang, Bingrui Wang, Hongwei Wang, Xingli Lui and Hua Zhang. We know that the original water holding capacity is 2.5 g/g and it increased by 0.25% under a 900 V electrostatic field. To find the actual increase, we need to calculate 0.25% of 2.5 g/g. 0.25% of 2.5 g/g = (0.25 / 100) * 2.5 g/g = 0.00625 g/g So, the increase in water holding capacity is 0.00625 g/g.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

19


If the emulsification stability of gluten increased by 10% under EFAF and the original stability index was 50, what would be the new stability index?

55

We know the original stability index is 50 and it increased by 10% under EFAF. First, we need to find out what 10% of 50 is: 10% of 50 = (10/100) * 50 = 5 Now, we add this increase to the original stability index: New stability index = 50 + 5 = 55 So, the new stability index is 55.

By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Effects of electrostatic field-assisted freezing on the functional properties and aggregation behavior of gluten by Yanyan Zhang, Siqi Zhang, Bingrui Wang, Hongwei Wang, Xingli Lui and Hua Zhang. We know the original stability index is 50 and it increased by 10% under EFAF. First, we need to find out what 10% of 50 is: 10% of 50 = (10/100) * 50 = 5 Now, we add this increase to the original stability index: New stability index = 50 + 5 = 55 So, the new stability index is 55.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

20


What is the significance of the g-g-g configuration of disulfide bonds in gluten proteins under EFAF?

Represents the most stable energy configuration

The key piece of information here is that the g-g-g configuration is described as the "dominant disulfide bond configuration with the most stable energy." This directly links the g-g-g configuration to its stability.

By using critical things way and study from the scientific paper name Effects of electrostatic field-assisted freezing on the functional properties and aggregation behavior of gluten by Yanyan Zhang, Siqi Zhang, Bingrui Wang, Hongwei Wang, Xingli Lui and Hua Zhang. The key piece of information here is that the g-g-g configuration is described as the "dominant disulfide bond configuration with the most stable energy." This directly links the g-g-g configuration to its stability.

7

-.50 -.25 +.25 เต็ม 0 -35% +30% +35%

ผลคะแนน 99.5 เต็ม 140

แท๊ก หลักคิด
แท๊ก อธิบาย
แท๊ก ภาษา