| 1 |
What is the purpose of the empirical case study on coal manufacturing in the paper?
|
To criticize existing transportation routes |
|
เป็นการสื่อสารการผลิตถ่านหินโดยการสาธิตรูปแบบแนะนำมาเป็นการศึกษาวิธีทานหินโดยการสถิตรูปแบบนำมาสนับสนุนนำเสนอสินค้า |
ทฤษฎีดาราศาสตร์ |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 2 |
Which factor does the model NOT consider in route selection for a multimodal transportation network?
|
Cultural preferences |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 3 |
What is the role of expert judgments in the decision support model?
|
They define the ZOGP objective function |
|
|
ทฤษฎีมนุษย์นิยม |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 4 |
What logistics system aspect does the proposed methodology aim to improve?
|
Cost management |
|
|
ทฤษฎีมนุษย์นิยม |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 5 |
Essay | Describe the role of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Zero-One Goal Programming (ZOGP) in the decision support model for determining an optimal multimodal transportation route. Explain how these methodologies contribute to the model's effectiveness and discuss any potential limitations.
|
|
|
|
ทฤษฎีการขนส่ง |
10 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 6 |
What is the role of the FAHP method in the proposed risk analysis model?
|
To evaluate linguistic variables |
|
|
ทฤษฎีเทคโนโลยี |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 7 |
Which industry is used as a case study in the proposed risk analysis model?
|
Coal |
|
|
ทฤษฎีมนุษย์นิยม |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 8 |
What does the DEA method do in the proposed FAHP-DEA methodology?
|
Analyzes road safety issues |
|
|
ทฤษฎีเทคโนโลยี |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 9 |
Which method is used to aggregate risk scores into an overall risk score in the proposed model?
|
Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) |
|
|
ทฤษฎีการคำนวน |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 10 |
Essay | Using the coal industry case study, please explain how the proposed risk analysis model is practical and aids in prioritizing risks. Discuss how this model can be beneficial for industries in optimizing multimodal transportation routes under risk decision criteria.
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 11 |
How were geotechnical parameters of soils at landslide-prone sites evaluated in the study?
|
Satellite remote sensing datasets |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 12 |
What modeling techniques were used to assess the probability of landslide occurrence in the future?
|
Support Vector Machines |
|
|
ทฤษฎีการเคลื่อนที่แผ่นดินไหว |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 13 |
What is the potential application of the study's findings in hazard management?
|
Devising countermeasures for managing landslides |
|
|
ทฤษฎีการเคลื่อนที่แผ่นดินไหว |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 14 |
How does the study aim to contribute to hazard management in the Himalayas?
|
By focusing on economic development in the region |
|
|
ทฤษฎีมนุษย์นิยม |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 15 |
Essay | Explain the methodology employed in the study to evaluate geotechnical parameters and assess the probability of future landslide events. Discuss the potential implications of using artificial intelligence and machine learning in hazard management in the Himalayas, with reference to the study's guiding framework.
|
|
|
|
ทฤษฎีความน่าจะเป็น |
10 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 16 |
How was the landslide inventory database divided for training and testing in the research?
|
70% training, 30% testing |
|
|
ทฤษฎีการเคลื่อนที่แผ่นดินไหว |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 17 |
Which machine learning model showed the highest prediction rate among LR, RF, and DRT?
|
Decision and Regression Tree (DRT) |
|
|
ทฤษฎีการคาดคะเน |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 18 |
What do the ROC values for training and testing data signify in the context of landslide susceptibility mapping?
|
The economic and environmental damage |
|
|
ทฤษฎีการเคลื่อนที่แผ่นดินไหว |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 19 |
Which model is considered more realistic according to susceptibility zones in the research?
|
All models are equally realistic |
|
|
ทฤษฎีการอ่อนไหว |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 20 |
Essay | Compare and contrast the performance of Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Decision and Regression Tree (DRT) models in landslide susceptibility mapping. Discuss the strengths and limitations of each model based on the research findings.
|
|
|
|
ทฤษฎีการเคลื่อนที่แผ่นดินไหว |
10 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|