| 1 |
Which factor is considered a major driver of land cover change contributing to landslides in the Chattogram District?
|
Large-scale deforestation for agriculture only |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 2 |
What does the ROC value for a model indicate in the context of this study?
|
The accuracy of the model in predicting landslide susceptibility |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 3 |
According to the study, what percentage of the Chattogram District's area is highly susceptible to landslides?
|
9-12% |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 4 |
How are the logistic regression model's coefficients used in landslide susceptibility mapping?
|
To assess the environmental impact |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 5 |
What is the importance of the Stream Density factor according to the Random Forest model in the document?
|
Moderate importance compared to other factors |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 6 |
According to the document, which machine learning model showed the highest success rate in training data?
|
Random Forest |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 7 |
What is the primary geological characteristic of the Chattogram District that contributes to landslide susceptibility?
|
Folded anticlines and synclines with unconsolidated sedimentary rocks |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 8 |
How do land use and land cover (LULC) changes influence landslide occurrences in the Chattogram District?
|
They decrease landslide risk by stabilizing slopes |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 9 |
What percentage of total variance is explained by the first factor in the factor analysis discussed in the document?
|
13.44% |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 10 |
According to the factor analysis, which factor is related to the cost and sufficiency of manure?
|
Factor 2: Soil analysis and plant nutrient utilization |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 11 |
According to the factor analysis, which factor is related to the cost and sufficiency of manure?
|
Factor 2: Soil analysis and plant nutrient utilization |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 12 |
What is the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy reported in the document?
|
0.900 |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 13 |
Which of the following statements best describes the contribution of Factor 2 in the factor analysis?
|
It is related to soil analysis and plant nutrient utilization. |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 14 |
Which factor is primarily associated with limitations in the utilization of chemical fertilizer and manure according to the document?
|
Factor 2 |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 15 |
What is the percentage of variance explained by all four factors together?
|
19.06% |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 16 |
What is the highest mean value for the propositions used in the factor analysis, according to the document?
|
2.814 |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 17 |
What was the minimum magnitude for the factor loads considered for interpreting the analysis results in the factor analysis?
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 18 |
According to the document, how many factors were initially considered before deciding on the final number?
|
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 19 |
Which method was used for rotation in the factor analysis described in the document?
|
Equimax |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 20 |
Based on the factor analysis, how is Factor 1 defined in the document?
|
Limitations in the utilization of chemical fertilizer and manure |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|